Build a cryptocurrency trading platform where the primary design goal is preventing catastrophic loss — not maximizing returns. The platform must survive compromised credentials, rogue orders, and operator error with multiple independent safety layers.
Solution Architecture
Defense-in-Depth Design
Five independent components, each with separate credentials and failure domains:
Agentic AI Governance — Control Plane for AI Agents
Challenge
Autonomous AI agents are executing tool calls — database queries, API requests, file operations — with minimal human oversight. Enterprises deploying agents face regulatory requirements (EU AI Act Art. 12-14, Singapore MGF) for human oversight, audit trails, and authorization controls. Existing agent frameworks (LangChain, AutoGPT, CrewAI) have no built-in governance layer.
Build a control-plane overlay that intercepts, authorizes, logs, and audits every tool call made by an AI agent — without modifying the agent or tool code.
•
AI GovernanceEU AI ActAgent SecurityOWASP LLMHuman-in-the-LoopAudit Trail
Enterprises in defence, government, healthcare, and finance operate isolated network segments with zero egress to the public internet. These environments require compliance automation (vulnerability scanning, policy enforcement, evidence collection) but cannot pull container images from public registries, download vulnerability databases, or send telemetry externally. Existing compliance tools assume internet connectivity.
Build a fully offline compliance platform delivered via USB sneakernet or internal mirror, with all dependencies pre-bundled.
The AEC (Architecture, Engineering, Construction) industry is stuck with 30-year-old software architecture. Autodesk Revit struggles with models beyond 500MB, cannot handle true multi-user editing, and crashes when federated models exceed 1GB. Large industrial projects (power plants, factories, data centers) routinely hit 100GB-1TB — forcing teams into complex workarounds.
Build a ground-up BIM platform that treats terabyte models as first-class, editable objects.
The Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA, EU 2022/2554) requires 40,000 EU financial entities — banks, payment institutions, e-money providers, crypto exchanges (MiCA), and insurtech — to classify and report major ICT incidents within strict deadlines: 4 hours (initial notification), 72 hours (intermediate report), and 1 month (final report). Manual classification against EBA/ESMA/EIOPA criteria is slow and error-prone; missing deadlines triggers regulatory penalties.
EU AI Act Doc Generator — Automated Compliance Artifacts
Challenge
The EU AI Act (Regulation 2024/1689) requires AI system providers to produce extensive documentation: risk classification per Annex III, technical documentation per Annex IV (model cards, risk assessments, data governance records, human oversight procedures), and conformity assessment evidence. Manual documentation is time-consuming, inconsistent, and difficult to maintain over the 7-year retention period.
Build a platform that automates the generation of EU AI Act-compliant documentation artifacts.
•
EU AI ActAI DocumentationModel CardsRisk AssessmentConformity AssessmentRegulatory Compliance
Kubernetes teams in regulated industries spend 8-16 weeks integrating policy enforcement (Kyverno), runtime security (Falco), network isolation (Calico), secrets management (Vault), and service mesh (Istio) to meet compliance requirements. Each tool requires separate expertise, and maintaining policy coherence across tools is error-prone.
Build a single Helm chart that deploys the entire compliance stack, driven by a ComplianceProfile custom resource that automatically configures all components for the selected framework.
Multi-Framework Evidence Graph — One Evidence, Many Frameworks
Challenge
Compliance teams managing multiple frameworks (SOC 2, PCI DSS, ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, AI Act) collect redundant evidence for overlapping controls. A single penetration test report might satisfy requirements in 4 different frameworks, but each auditor receives a separate package. Manual mapping is error-prone, and proving evidence integrity during audits requires custom tooling.
Build an evidence repository where one artifact maps to multiple frameworks, with cryptographic integrity proofs and OSCAL-compliant audit package generation.
Job searching across multiple platforms is time-consuming. Telegram channels post hundreds of vacancies daily, LinkedIn requires manual browsing, and HH.ru (Russia’s Indeed) needs separate attention. Manually reviewing all postings and assessing fit is inefficient.
Build a pipeline that:
Aggregates jobs from Telegram, LinkedIn, and HH.ru
Ranks every posting against your CV using AI
Runs entirely locally (no cloud API costs, no data leakage)
Supports multiple job search profiles (DevSecOps, Data Analyst, PM)
# Using profilepython -m jobs_finder pipeline --profile devsecops -v
# Skip specific sourcespython -m jobs_finder pipeline --skip-linkedin --skip-hh -v
# Force re-rank everythingpython -m jobs_finder pipeline --no-state
Output
outputs/2026-05-15/
├── telegram.jsonl # Raw scraped posts
├── linkedin.jsonl # Raw scraped jobs
├── hh.jsonl # Raw vacancies
└── ranked/
├── ranked.jsonl # All jobs with scores
└── report.md # Top-N markdown report